| dc.description.abstract |
Machine learning techniques have become an essential part of research into the detection and classification of malicious applications. There are several approaches or algorithms that learn from existing data and predict classes. Machine learning principles recommend a balance of classes in the training dataset, but the reality on the ground is quite different. The majority of datasets used for malicious application detection are unbalanced. Class imbalance degrades classifier performance, so it is a common problem in classification tasks. This observation is much more significant in the field of Android malware detection and classification. There is little work to our knowledge on the effects of unbalanced datasets in the field of Android malware detection. Our contribution focuses on the impact of unbalanced datasets on the performance of different algorithms and the relevance of using evaluation metrics in Android malware detection. And the state of the databases from which researchers typically draw datasets. We show that for malicious application detection, some classification algorithms are not suitable for unbalanced datasets. We also prove that some of the most widely used performance evaluation metrics in the literature (Accuracy, Precision, Recall) are not very well suited to unbalanced datasets. On the other hand, the metrics (Balanced Accuracy, Geometric mean) are more suitable. These results were obtained by evaluating the performances of eleven classification algorithms as well as the adequacy of the different evaluation metrics (Accuracy, Recall, Precision, F1_score, Balanced accuracy, Matthews corrcoef, Geometric mean, Fowlkes_mallows). Also not all databases are accessible by researchers and many of these databases are not updated. |
en_US |