.

Seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in pastoralists and their livestock in Central Equatoria State, South Sudan

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Emmanuel, P. LitaI
dc.contributor.author Erneo, B. Ochi
dc.contributor.author Gerald, Misinzo
dc.contributor.author Henriette, van HeerdenI
dc.contributor.author Robab, Katani
dc.contributor.author Jacques, Godfroid
dc.contributor.author Coletha, Mathew
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-12T12:18:02Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-12T12:18:02Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.rsif-paset.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/508
dc.description publication en_US
dc.description.abstract Brucellosis poses serious public health implications and substantial economic losses in pastoral rural settings in South Sudan. In humans, brucellosis is almost always originating from animals. Current literature provides scant data regarding the seroprevalence of brucellosis in South Sudan. This cross-sectional study investigates the seroprevalence of brucellosis among the pastoral community and livestock and identifies risk factors for the disease from two Counties, Terekeka and Juba in Central Equatoria State (CES), South Sudan. Methodology A total of 986 sera; from humans (n = 143), cattle (n = 478), sheep (n = 86), and goats (n = 279) were randomly collected from 17 cattle camps in CES. Sera for the humans, cattle and goats were screened for Brucella-specific antibodies using Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT) and further confirmed by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (c-ELISA) in series due to the cost of testing. All the sera from sheep were tested in parallel using RBPT and c-ELISA as the sheep samples were few and were all tested negative on the RBPT. A camp was considered positive when at least one animal of either species tested positive on the c-ELISA. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information on potential individual and herd level risk factors. Univariate analysis using binary logistic regression with a confidence interval of 95% at a p-value of � 0.05 was used to identify the association between the potential individual risk factors and Brucella seropositivity. The investigated en_US
dc.description.sponsorship check pdf en_US
dc.publisher PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES en_US
dc.subject Seroprevalence en_US
dc.subject pastoralists en_US
dc.subject Equatoria State en_US
dc.subject South Sudan en_US
dc.title Seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in pastoralists and their livestock in Central Equatoria State, South Sudan en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search RSIF Digital Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account